Informacciones sobre el álbum Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Lunes 2 Febrero 2026 salió el nuevo álbum de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, del nombre Genius Casebook: Con Law.
El álbum se constituye de 111 canciones. Podéis hacer clic sobre las canciones para visualizar los respectivos textos y
Aquí está una pequeña lista de canciones que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg podría optar por cantar que incluye el álbum del que cada canción está
- Loving v. Virginia
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- United States v. Lopez
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Clinton v. Jones
- Printz v. United States
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Morrison v. Olson
- Nixon v. United States
- Wickard v. Filburn
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Ex Parte Milligan
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Marsh v. Alabama
- New York v. United States
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- United States v. Windsor
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Ex Parte Young
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Roe v. Wade
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- Stafford v. Wallace
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Miller v. California
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Reno v. Condon
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Champion v. Ames
- Korematsu v. United States
- United States v. Morrison
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Washington v. Davis
- United States v. Virginia
- United States v. Darby
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Bush v. Gore
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Powell v. McCormack
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Marbury v. Madison
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- INS v. Chadha
- Romer v. Evans
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- Honig v. Doe
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Cooper v. Aaron
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Baker v. Carr
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Texas v. Johnson
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Rasul v. Bush
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Maine v. Taylor
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Alden v. Maine
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Civil Rights Cases
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
